I gave ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini the exact same research brief, then opened every source and scored all three reports on one 100-point rubric.
This video shows which AI produced the most defensible decision brief, where each one failed, and a repeatable way to choose the right AI for research work.
The job: prepare a source-grounded brief for a five-person creative agency considering a four-day workweek. I scored each report on coverage, factual accuracy, source quality, citation integrity, and decision usefulness.
THE RESULTS
ChatGPT: 96/100
Claude: 89/100
Gemini: 65/100
This video shows which AI produced the most defensible decision brief, where each one failed, and a repeatable way to choose the right AI for research work.
The job: prepare a source-grounded brief for a five-person creative agency considering a four-day workweek. I scored each report on coverage, factual accuracy, source quality, citation integrity, and decision usefulness.
THE RESULTS
ChatGPT: 96/100
Claude: 89/100
Gemini: 65/100
- Категория
- AI Инструменты
Выполните вход или зарегистрируйтесь для отправки комментария.
Комментариев нет.
